|
References
1. Jecquier A. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A clinician's viewpoint. Hum Reprod 2005;20(8):2039-42.
2. Holt W. Debate continued: Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A spermatologist's viewpoint. Hum Reprod 2005;Jul 8.
3. Levine B, Titus JM, Moore K, et al. Use of prostate specific antigen in the identification of semen in postmortem cases. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2004;25(4):288-90.
4. Khaldi N, Miras A, Botti K, et al. Evaluation of three rapid detection methods for the forensic identification of seminal fluid in rape cases. J Forensic Sci 2004;49(4):749-53.
5. Toennes SW, Kauert GF, Steinmeyer S, et al. Driving under the influence of drugs: Evaluation of analytical data of drugs in oral fluid, serum and urine, and correlation with impairment symptoms. Forensic Sci Int 2005;10:152.
6. Gronholm M, Lillsunde P. A comparison between on-site immunoassay drug-testing devices and laboratory results. Forensic Sci Int 2001; Sept. 15;121(1-2):37-46.
7. Biermann T, Schwarze B, Zedler B, et al. On-site testing of illicit drugs: The use of the drug-testing device "Toxiquick" J Anal Toxicol 2004;Mar;28(2):132-4.
8. Gunnar T, Ariniemi K, Lillsunde P. An analytical procedure for the simultaneous sensitive identification, screening and quantitation. J Mass Spectrom 2005; 40(6):739-53.
9. Crouch DJ, Walsh JM, Flegel R, et al. An evaluation of selected saliva point-of-collection drug-testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(4):244-8.
10. Degutis LC, Rabinovici R, Sabbaj A, et al. The saliva strip test is an accurate method to determine blood alcohol concentration in trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11(8):885-7.
11. Verstraete AG. Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and saliva. Ther Drug Monit 2004; 26(2):200-5.
12. Levy S, Van Hook S, Knight J. A review of Internet-based home drug-testing products for parents. Pediatrics 2004;113(4):720-6.
13. Limaye A, Connor AJ, Huang X, et al. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127(2):200-4.
14. Koumans EH, Black CM, Markowitz LE, et al. Comparison of methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests and a liquid pap smear medium. Clin Microbiol 2003;41(4):1507-11.
15. Masumoto N, Fujii T, Ishikawa M, et al. Papanicolaou tests and molecular analyses using new fluid-based specimen collection technology in 3000 Japanese women. Br J Cancer 2003;88(12):1883-8.
16. Aryee EA, Bailey RL, Natividad-Sancho A, et al. Detection, quantification and genotyping of Herpes Simplex Virus in cervicovaginal secretions by real-time PCR: a cross sectional survey. Virol J 2005;2(1):61.
17. Strauss RA, Eucker B, Savitz DA, et al. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis from self-obtained vaginal swabs. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2005;13(1):31-5.
18. Aryee EA, Bailey RL, Natividad-Sancho A, et al. Detection, quantification and genotyping of Herpes Simplex Virus in cervicovaginal secretions by real-time PCR: A cross sectional survey. Virol J 2005;2(1):61.
19. Alliende ME, Cabezon C, Figueroa H, et al. Cervicovaginal fluid changes to detect ovulation accurately.
|